Do you want to leave the rest of the people who, say, did not read The Silmarillion, and do not know that Sauron, at first was only a henchman of Melkor, and he, in turn, at first did not want to become the dark ruler of Arda, but was only one of the Valar, who. Except for a smile, this does not cause me anything else. Unfortunately! And finally, the third group, the so-called 'TRU-FANS TOLKINA', shout that 'this is a complete perversion, over the professor's novel'. The second, as a rule, say 'come back to reality', 'how can you watch it, look around or watch a movie with a life story at its core' :) because I can see a life story like that, but THIS is only on the screen. Otherwise, I would certainly compare these two works, and of course I would look for shortcomings, errors and inaccuracies in the plot, which, by the way, are very skillfully disguised so that a simple viewer could understand it without reading the book (by the way, in the director's version, there are many of these inaccuracies have been eliminated, for example the small fact that Isildur was only killed when the ring slipped from his finger - this passage was cut from the final version).Īfter the release of the film, those who watched it were divided into three groups.
It was not in vain that I mentioned that the film fell into my hands before the book, and that I did not regret it at all.
It was as if I had plunged into an extraordinary world where good fights evil, where green groves alternate with moss-covered statues and ancient ruins, into a world where, making your way through the forest path, you can meet sharp-eared unfading elves or vile orcs - as you are lucky. Before him, I was not a fan of John Tolkien, as, indeed, of all fantasy in general, but as soon as I watched the first ten minutes of the film and the rest flew by in one breath. It was about four years ago, but I still remember that moment to this day. Fortunately, I got to watch the movie before reading the book.
0 kommentar(er)
